President Trump and Joe Biden, in the run-up to the Presidential election, have staked out dueling positions on the climate, suggesting voters to either care (the democratic stance, pretending to know) or not care (republican stance, oblivious to nature’s evolution) about our environment.
Neither position is rooted in our best understanding of nature’s truth. Thus both are false and contrary to the pageantry of positivity so punitive to humanity—the reason why I describe the endorsement of today’s politics as a bifurcated trench leading to the slaughterhouse.
Science Of Nature
In the words of Richard Feynman, science is nothing more than the study of nature. Science, to put things in perspective, is not the source of knowledge but a derivative of nature’s truth. A manmade process, as I explain in Learn To Think, to establish, optimize, and question our evolving proxy of nature’s truth.
Climate change is not a hoax, but it is not manmade, albeit accelerated by human solipsism. Our climate, as I have explained before, is subject to entropy. An irreversible process of every declining availability of energy as the fallout from the Big Bang explosion 13.72 billion years ago. A fallout, in scientific terms, caused by the asymmetry innate to entropy, with an organized state, prior to the explosion, leading to an unorganized state as the fallout of the explosion. Think fireworks in slow motion.
Thankfully, the process of energy decline is slow, relative to human renewal. Our best estimates suggest earth will exist for another 3.5 billion years. Not bad compared to the paltry lifespan of only 100,000 years of human existence, depending on the point at which you consider the cognitive ability of our species to be human. I can name quite a few people living today as the exception to reasonable cognitive disposition.
Climate change cannot be reversed, for nature’s entropy cannot. The only thing we can do is pore less gas on its fire, and offer our best defense to nature’s entropy.
Politics Of Science
These days, to be called a scientist is as easy as being called an author. A meaningless attempt to justify the mere existence of research or the number of words written begets merit. Not all science is created equal. In the same way, writing about something often does not necessarily mean you know what you are talking about.
Real scientists, like Einstein or Feynman, sought to discover unprecedented normalizations of truth upstream, the inverse of crowds of rebels without a cause ruminating in downstream sub-optimizations of foregone conclusions, supported by the data of hindsight, also calling themselves scientists.
The discoveries of Einstein, Feynman, and modern-day scientists like Lawrence Krauss are awe-inspiring. As with any real expertise in life, the army of wannabes starving for attention teaching high-priced garbage to students soils the reputation and education of science.
The game politicians play, either to rely on the self-proclaimed disciples of science or to ignore them does not – on its own – infer any meaningful association with nature’s truth. It is as easy to disclaim the value of science pontificated by the many charlatans in science, as it is to latch-on to science from its astounding discoveries subsequently ignored.
In the use of science as a proxy to nature’s truth, a false-negative is as destructive to humanity as a false-positive.
Wrong By Ignorance
Both Trump and Biden are wrong in their assessment of science.
Trump is wrong in asserting we do not know what causes our climate to change and no pertinent response is needed. Biden, like Al Gore, is wrong to think humans can fix climate change, as he was wrong in signing up to fix cancer (remember?). Another example of ill-advised bandaging of undesirable wounds of correlation taking away from the discovery of causation of the disease(s).
The battle of human ignorance is playing out in front of our eyes, once again, to the embarrassment of the world. A battle that will have the same Pyrrhic victory as before, a dumb and solipsistic prioritization of human wants over human needs in blatant disregard to our dependence on nature’s principles.
Lead, Or Get Out Of The Way
We must elect better leaders. Leaders who comprehend how nature controls us and only our best evolving understanding of nature’s truth, with or without the help of the manmade practice of science, can improve human adaptability to nature’s entropy.
The choice for a leader is not a political one, it is a choice for the best proxy of nature’s truth upon which we all, regardless of political views, depend.